Are Xeon Processors Good For Music Production?

Here we start all information about Are Xeon Processors Good For Music Production? The benefits of a Xeon for a hexacore CPU only come into play if you need ECC RAM, which you don’t. The main benefit of a Xeon in this footprint is that you can run two of them simultaneously.

There’s hardly any incentive to acquire one if you’re not planning to add a second Xeon later and will only be using a single one. A 5820K will do (unless you require a large number of PCIe lanes, in which case a 5930k is preferable.

But unless you require a large number of lanes, spare yourself the $200.) You need more than 8 cores for a single CPU computer before Xeons provide a performance benefit over a current-generation stock-clocked i7.

Are Xeon Processors Good For Music Production?

For music creation, an i7 is most likely sufficient. If you require additional processing, another alternative is to use audio processors created specifically for audio, such as UAD Satellite. Xeon is an i7 CPU that can communicate with another processor on the same board. It can do ECC ram, which means your operating system can check for faulty memory, making your PC more durable in the long run.

However, Xeon’s greatest advantage is when used in a multiprocessor configuration. However, it comes at a high cost, as you’ll need to choose a specific motherboard and purchase a graphics card (most Xeons don’t include one).

What’s The Point Of Intel Core I9 When There’s Already Xeon?

There are a few distinctions between Core CPUs and Xeon processors. Because Xeons are excellent for servers, they primarily target commercial markets. They have numerous cores for various tasks, and they’re designed to work in tandem with other processors.

This isn’t to say that you can’t buy a computer with a Xeon processor; they’re just not designed for you (using them for non-business private computer use). On the other hand, core processors are primarily aimed at non-business users.

These processors are faster than Xeon processors but have fewer cores. For those markets, higher speeds are preferable to more cores because they are typically utilized for a single application, and most apps are designed for single threads.

We’re approaching the point where 2, 4, or 8 cores are ubiquitous, but there aren’t always the same benefits as in the server sector. These kinds of discrepancies are rather prevalent. There will often be almost identical hardware with minor variations sold to different markets. That is the distinction between Core i9 and Xeon processors.

Consider The Following Scenario

Intel could release a 22-core Xeon processor with many caches rated at 3.0 GHz. They could also introduce an 18-core i9 rated at 4.0 GHz with less cache. They may look similar, yet they aim to sell to distinct markets because of slight variances. NVIDIA does something similar with their GPUs, with some designed for gaming systems and others for server use.

What Are The Benefits Of Xeon Processors?

I prefer the Xeon, which I purchased used. It’s quick, modern, and has much more throughput (PCIe lanes), but it can’t be overclocked in the chipsets I buy. They’re designed for the most demanding, time-sensitive tasks and are priced accordingly.

However, like purchasing an off-lease automobile, exceptional performance will be available in a few years at a significantly discounted price for early adopters. I bought it to handle a 4K video, but it also works nicely in Photoshop and for gaming

Why Are I7 Processors Not Used In Our Mobile?

ARM-based CPUs are now found in more than 90% of smartphones. The dominance of ARM’s instruction set-based processors in this industry is so great that Intel had to abandon ambitions to manufacture mobile CPUs based on their x86 architecture. On the contrary, x86-based Intel CPUs power more than 90% of data centers, with ARM CPUs accounting for less than 1% of the market.

That reveals something to us. Both companies’ goods have a design element that makes them suited for a specific market. A top-end ARM CPU, such as the Cortex-A73, uses less than 1W, whereas a top-end i7 CPU uses over 100W! The IPC and clock frequency supplied by Intel equivalents, on the other hand, are significantly higher than those offered by ARM CPUs.

Power efficiency is crucial for mobile devices, yet it can somewhat impair performance. Data centers are performance-driven and can put up with the power requirements if the CPU performs well. As a result, each market will select a product that is appropriate for them.

That’s what we’re seeing in the market right now. Can ARM now produce a CPU with a higher IPC for use in laptops and servers? Is Intel capable of developing an ultra-low-power CPU and introducing it to the mobile market? They certainly can try! Such competition is good and exciting for fans!

Conclusion

The short answer about Are Xeon Processors Good For Music Production? Is that money isn’t a concern, so buy the most expensive item you can afford? Your rig will be able to withstand the test of time. The other explanation is that there is no performance difference between Xeon and i7 CPUs in the DAW.

Some people are constructing DAW workstations using two processors. I assume you’re looking at a Mac Pro because you’re using Logic? To make music, an i7 processor is probably adequate. Another option if you need more processing power.

In any event, go for the fastest and most stable Intel processor you can afford. Then fill up your RAM and storage to the brim. More RAM means more plug-ins, and more storage means more sound libraries.

Have you tried using a DSP solution such as the UAD-2 Octo or Waves Sound grid to offload plug-in processing to a separate card or server? I’m intrigued. A custom PC i7 quad @ 3.6 with 32 GB of ram and 6TB of space (2.5TB sound libs) and an MBPr with i5, 16GB, and 1TB storage run Ableton Live and Pro Tools HD for me.

Frequently Asked Questions